1
8905EDN
Assessment Task 1 Rubric
Criteria
Outstanding
100-85
Very High
84-75
High
74-65
Satisfactory
64-50
Unsatisfactory
49-45
Limited
44-25
Very limited
24-1
Demonstrates
understanding of, and
critical insight into, the
selected research
methodology and
implications of
research principles
Methodology is
insightfully explained
in light of the research
principles and
philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach. An
extensive range of
implications is
considered.
Methodology is well
explained in light of
the research principles
and philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach. A
range of implications is
considered.
Methodology is
logically explained in
light of the research
principles and
philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach.
Some implications are
considered.
Methodology is
explained generally in
light of the research
principles and
philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach. A
few implications are
considered.
Methodology is
unevenly explained in
light of the research
principles and
philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach.
Very few implications
are considered.
Methodology is poorly
explained in light of
the research principles
and philosophy and
processes of the
selected approach.
Very few or no
implications are
considered.
Shows engagement
with the scholarly
literature relating to
the selected research
methodology
Response
demonstrates
evidence of critical
reading of relevant and
complex research
literature to support
the discussion.
Response
demonstrates evidence
of wide and deep
reading of relevant and
current research
literature to support
the discussion.
Response
demonstrates
evidence of wide
reading of relevant
research literature to
support the discussion.
Response
demonstrates evidence
of reading of relevant
research literature to
support the discussion.
Some research
literature mentioned
but connections are
unclear.
Little consideration of
research literature.
Response is often
unclear or
unconnected to
theory/context.
Demonstrates
understanding of key
methods for data
collection/analysis
aligned with the
methodology
Logically connects
methodology, methods
and paradigms with
highly relevant
discussion and
examples.
Logically connects
methodology, methods
and paradigms with
relevant discussion and
examples.
Logically connects
methodology, methods
and paradigms with
discussion and
examples.
Is able to connect
methodology, methods
and paradigms as part
of the discussion.
Is sometimes able to
connect methodology,
methods in the
discussion.
Is rarely to connect
methodology, methods
and paradigms.
Significant
misunderstandings of
methodology and
theoretical
connections.
Presents critical
analysis of research
methodology and
Three papers have
been identified and
critically analysed with
insightful connections
Three papers have
been appropriately
selected and critically
analysed with useful
Three papers have
been appropriately
selected and analysed
with some connections
Three papers have
been appropriately
selected and explained
with a few connections
While there is evidence
of understanding of
one or both chosen
methodologies in the
Misunderstanding of
the selected
methodology is
2
Criteria
Outstanding
100-85
Very High
84-75
High
74-65
Satisfactory
64-50
Unsatisfactory
49-45
Limited
44-25
Very limited
24-1
methods reported in
three scholarly papers
to literature associated
with the methodology
and associated
methods.
connections to
literature associated
with the methodology
and associated
methods.
to literature associated
with the methodology
and associated
methods.
to literature associated
with the methodology
and associated
methods.
papers, links are not
made to supporting
literature or theory.
evident in the
evaluations.
Papers have been
poorly selected or not
sufficiently analysed.
Little/no evidence of
connection to the
methodological field.
Demonstrates
academic and English
literacy
Writing is scholarly,
clear, engaging, and
error free.
References accurately
reflect APA 7 in all
instances.
Writing is scholarly and
clear, with no or few
errors. References
accurately reflect APA
7 in almost all
instances.
Writing is scholarly and
clear few errors.
References accurately
reflect APA 6 7 in most
instances.
Writing is generally
clear, logical and well
structured.
References mostly
conform to APA 7.
Writing is not always
scholarly or clear, and
there are errors.
References do not
accurately reflect APA
7.
Writing is difficult to
follow because of
structural or
grammatical problems.
References rarely
reflect APA 7.
The post Assessment Task 1 appeared first on My blog.
