Assessment 3 Case Study Information
Subject Code:
ACCM4200
Subject Name:
Advanced Financial
Accounting
Assessment Title:
Assessment 3
Assessment Type:
Statement of Advice
Word Limit:
2,000 words (+/- 10%)
Weighting:
40%
Total Marks:
40
Submission:
Individual via Turnitin on
MyKBS.
Due Date:
Tuesday of Week 13 at 19:55
AEST
Your Task
You must prepare a Statement of Advice (SoA) that addresses all the questions raised in the letter on the following three pages of this document.
Assessment Description
Assume that you are a team of graduate accountants working for Pinnacle Pty Ltd, an independent consulting & accounting firm located at 11 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000. Among other things, your firm provides its clients with advice regarding accounting issues, including applying the Australian Accounting Standards in preparing Financial Reports. You must prepare a Statement of Advice (SoA) for National Ltd to address several accounting issues raised by Ms. Sullivan Sampson on behalf of the company’s directors. Ms. Sampson has raised these issues in a letter in the following three pages.
The maximum length for the SoA is 2,000 words (+/- 10%). You should address all the technical issues in your advice, followed by a Reference List. Marks will be awarded based on two components:
Technical component 30% – This includes the technical discussion in your SoA, the explanation of each issue, and the sources used. You must analyse the information provided and recommend the correct accounting treatment. You must justify your recommendations by referencing specific paragraphs of relevant accounting standards. You must explain the rationale behind each accounting standard requirement.
Communication Skills (Writing Skills) component 10% – marks will be awarded based on your ability to gather information and effectively communicate strategies to the client as part of the SoA. It will also cover the generic skill of writing, clear meaning, structure and organisation, appropriate tone and grammar, spelling, and punctuation, etc., throughout the whole assignment.
Refer to the rubrics at the end of this document for a breakdown of marks.
Letter received from Ms. Sullivan Sampson (National Ltd)
Ms. Sullivan Sampson
On behalf of the Directors of National Limited 58 Dixon Avenue, Warwick Farm NSW 2123
1 July 2023
The Manager
Pinnacle Pty Ltd, Accounting firm
11 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000
Dear Sir/Madam
I am writing to seek your advice regarding numerous accounting issues for the year ended 30 June 2023. As you know, most of our directors have limited accounting knowledge and are a bit confused with the accounting treatment for several items that our junior accountant has proposed. Our senior accountant is on sick leave, and we are unsure when she will be back. The directors want to ensure that the junior accountant’s proposal is in line with the requirements of the Australian Accounting Standards. They would also like to understand the reasoning behind the appropriate accounting treatments. The items of concern are as follows:
Item 1
During the year, the company developed a new project called “Jonny King”. We commenced work to improve water filtering services on 1 July 2022, resulting in a patent for the Jonny King filter process in June 2023. The company expects approximately 10% increased sales revenue from selling Jonny King filters in the current water filtering market.
Our marketing director says there is a possibility we can recognise the following costs (all) as an asset, but he has not been clear on how to make this determination. Can you please explain whether all the cost below can be recognised as part of an asset? Please explain the requirements with examples that would be relevant to this case.
July 2022
Research conducted to develop filters
$340 000
Sep 2022
The search for application of research
findings
$114,000
Nov 2022
Formulation of improved Jonny King
filters
$97,000
Dec 2022
Purchase of machinery to construct Jonny
King filters* note 1
$300,000
Jan 2022
Design and construction of final selection
of possible alternatives
$156 000
Feb 2023
Operation of a pilot plant that is not for
commercial production
$79 000
Apr 2023
Testing of pre-use Jonny King filters
$270,000
July to April
Total wages paid to scientists and
technicians* note 2
$1,799,000
June 2023
Registration of a trade design fees
$1 500
June 2023
Lawyer fees incurred to protect Jonny King
filters brand against cheap copies
$15 000
June 2023
Selling and administrative costs allocated
$410,000
June 2023
Initial operating losses
$160,000
* Note 1: The machine was purchased on 1 December 2022 with a useful life of 6 years and no residual value.
* Note 2: The breakdown of Wages paid is as follows:
July
2022
September 2022
November 2022
January 2023
February 2023
April
2023
Total
$189,000
$240,000
$250,000
$330,000
$390,000
$400,000
$1,799,000
Item 2
On 12 May 2023, the board of directors decided to close down a division making a particular product. On 28 May 2023 a detailed plan for closing down the division was agreed by the board; letters were sent to customers warning them to seek an alternative source of supply and redundancy notices were sent to the staff of the division. Some staff will be relocated, and the company will pay for relocation costs to relevant staff.
The lease on the old factory continues for the next four months until it is closed. Unfortunately, the lease cannot be cancelled, and the factory cannot be re-let to another user.
The costs associated with this shutdown are expected to be as follows:
(a) Payout of staff annual leave $450,000.
(b) Redundancy payout $800,000.
(c) For those staff who will be moving to another division, retraining will be required at a cost of $500,000.
(d) As another division is located 200km from the division being closed down, National Ltd agreed to pay for the costs of relocating those employees to another division.
(e) The lease on old factory has five years to run. The cost of terminating the lease is expected to be $300,000.
(f) The financial and management information systems of the division being closed need to be reconfigured to be comparable with another system, so that it can be used in the new division. This is estimated to cost approximately $1 million.
(g) Expected loss due to closing down $979,000.
The above costs will be paid during August 2023. We are unsure whether we need to include the above costs in the 2023 annual reports. Please explain any disclosure requirements for such events as at 30 June 2023.
Item 3
As you know, we have recently become a listed company, and as a result of this, we issued 1,000,000 ordinary shares to the public for the first time at an issue price of $10. The shares were payable as follows:
$5 payable on application (closed on 28 January 2023)
$2 payable on allotment (received by 31 March 2023)
$3 payable on call made on 15 June 2023 and payable by 30 June 2023
All applicants paid only application money except a holder with 10,000 shares who paid $10 (full share price).
On 31 March 2023, we have recorded share capital of $10,000,000 in the book. However, we are unsure whether this amount has been correctly accounted, therefore advice on journal entries will be highly appreciated.
In addition, the call money due date was on 30 June and one of shareholders is not able to pay the call money on 4,000 shares he purchased. The prospectus state that shares will be forfeited and refund would be made to those who failed to pay call money. The underwriters informed us that they could sell 4,000 shares at $9 per share with a fee of $2,900.
It would be great if you could provide journal entries of the share issue process as examples in your explanations.
Yours sincerely,
Sullivan Sampson
Additional Requirements
1) You must include the following in your Statement of Advice (SoA):
a) Cover Page should include:
i) name/logo of your accounting and consulting firm ii) The words “Statement of Advice” iii) Who the document is prepared by iv)Who the document is prepared for v) Date
vi) Brief information on what the document is about
b) Table of Contents
c) Recommendations and explanations – include in-text referencing d) Conclusion
e) Reference list
2) Any sources that you use need to be acknowledged in order to avoid plagiarism. Information on referencing can be found under “Study Resources – Academic Skills” on MyKBS at this link.
3) You must identify and refer to specific paragraphs of the relevant accounting standards in your advice.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
• What is academic integrity and misconduct?
• What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
• What are the late penalties?
• How can I appeal my grade?
The answers to these questions can be accessed athttps://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/schoolpolicies.
Length Limits for Assessments
Penalties may be applied for assessment submissions that exceed prescribed limits.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Further details can be accessed at https://elearning.kbs.edu.au/course/view.php?id=1481
Rubrics
Technical
Component (30%)
Excellent:
>75%
Average:
50% – 75%
Weak:
<50%
Items 1, 2 &
3
(30
marks)
22.5 to 30 marks
15 to 22 marks
Less than 15 marks
All technical issues
raised clearly
identified and
addressed.
Clear, correct, and
decisive advice
provided, displaying an outstanding
understanding of
each of the technical
issues raised, so
that it is easy for the
client (non-
accountants) to
understand.
Reference has been correctly made to the AASBs with detailed paragraph
numbers.
Most technical issues raised
reasonably clearly, identified, and
addressed.
Mostly correct advice
displaying a
reasonable
understanding of
some of the technical
issues raised, so that
it is relatively easy for the client
(non-
accountants) to
understand. Reference has been
correctly made (with gaps) to the AASBs
with some paragraph
numbers.
Most technical issues not identified or
addressed.
Displays a lack of
understanding of
some or most of the technical issues
raised making it
difficult for the client to understand.
Little or no reference to the AASBs.
Communication
Skills
Component (10%)
Excellent:
>75%
Average:
50% – 75%
Weak:
<50%
Statement
of advice structure (4 marks)
3 to 4 marks
2 to 2.9 marks
Less than 2 marks
A proper format for a SoA has been
used. SoA clearly identifies each issue.
Format is effective and professional.
In-text referencing included where required.
Complete reference
list in the right format.
Format of SoA could be improved.
Most issues clearly
identified.
Format effective and professional with
some exceptions.
In-text referencing mostly included
where required.
Reference list partly
incomplete or not
always in the right
format.
Proper format not used.
Issues not clearly
identified
Format is neither
effective nor
professional.
In-text referencing hardly or not
included
at all.
Reference list incomplete or not the right
format.
Language
and presentation (3 marks)
2.25 to 3 marks
1.5 to 2.2 marks
Less than 1.5 marks
The presentation is
logical, persuasive,
and well supported by
evidence,
demonstrating a clear
flow of ideas and arguments.
Fluent professional
writing style
throughout. Grammar and
spelling accurate throughout.
Information, arguments, and
evidence are well
presented, mostly
clear flow of ideas and
arguments.
Reasonably professional writing style.
Grammar and spelling mainly accurate
Difficult to understand for audience, no
logical/clear
structure, poor flow of ideas, argument
lacks supporting evidence.
Meaning may be unclear.
Grammar and
spelling contain numerous errors.
In-text
reference
(3
marks)
2.25 to 3 marks
1.5 to 2.2 marks
Less than 1.5 marks
Inclusion of adequate and sufficient in-text referencing. In-text
referencing match with
referencing items at the end of SoA
Only a couple of
inclusion of adequate
in-text referencing. In-
text referencing match
with referencing items at the end of SoA
Non-inclusion of intext referencing.
Intext referencing
does not match with
referencing items at the end of SoA
