The death penalty is considered the most extreme punishment that the state can hand out. By its very nature, it invites controversy over morality and religious beliefs.

The death penalty is considered the most extreme punishment that the state can hand out. By its very nature, it invites controversy over morality and religious beliefs. Advocates both for and against capital punishment claim equal measures of moral righteousness in their arguments. Both those in favor and opponents of capital punishment have compelling opposing arguments. The corrections system must house and care for inmates awaiting execution for many years. This drawn-out process exacts untold emotional costs from the families of victims and the families of inmates. Several key U.S. Supreme Court decisions have weighed the constitutionality of this form of punishment. These legal decisions illustrate the complex social, legal, and humanitarian concerns that surround the death penalty.
Assuming that capital punishment is allowed by law, what would be the most humane way of carrying out a death sentence? Explain. Should the way a prisoner is executed vary based on case factors? If so, what are those factors? In your reply posts: Reply posts are due no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. CT. Critically examine the postings of your peers and provide at least two (2) substantive replies. Do you agree with your peer’s manner of execution? Why or why not? This is a discussion post