Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion Format 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A.

 This will be done in 3 different assignments to turn in separately but it is really all one big assignment. 1st Step – Due 1/14/2025 For this week’s performance task, you will submit a revised draft of your evidence-based change proposal using the PICOT format (see Week 3 Learning Objects page for a tutorial) https://youtu.be/pUcO3xwTb30 https://youtu.be/whXv-T6_ZQ0 . In addition to your PICOT question, include an annotated bibliography featuring three new peer-reviewed sources that are relevant to your proposed change. Please ensure your submission follows APA format. Note: you should have compiled six articles in your annotated bibliography this week Note: You will be adding to these each week (with 10 due by the end of Module 4). Rubric Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion Format 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Question follows appropriate PICO format including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. B. Question is highly relevant to practice. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Question missing one direct element of question. B. Question is relevant to practice. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Research question does not follow PICO format. B. Question may not be relevant to practice. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of all content covered. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a deep understanding of the concept. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Demonstrates a solid grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Demonstrates a limited grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a limited understanding of the concept. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. All of the thought processes and content are clear. B. Understanding is evident. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient Most of the thought processes and content are clear, and understanding is evident. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited Some of the thought processes and content are confusing and unclear. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing and APA 10 to >6.0 pts Exemplary Few to no grammatical or mechanical errors. B. Near-perfect APA formatting. C. Meets reference requirements per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain all necessary information. 6 to >4.0 pts Proficient A. Some grammatical and mechanical errors. B. Some APA errors. C. Some reference requirements met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain most of the necessary information. 4 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Grammatical and mechanical errors throughout. B. Multiple APA errors. C. Reference requirements not met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries may be missing necessary information. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts Total Points: 100 2ND STEP OF ASSIGNMENT DUE 1/23/26 For this week’s performance task, you will submit a revised draft of your evidence-based change proposal using the PICOT (see Week 4 Learning Objects page for a tutorial). In addition to your PICOT question, include an annotated bibliography featuring three new peer-reviewed sources that are relevant to your proposed change. Please include an annotated bibliography of four new peer-reviewed sources related to your proposed change. Please ensure your submission follows APA format. Note: you should have compiled ten articles in your annotated bibliography this week (you are allowed and encouraged to revise your previous entries)! Note: This is the completion of your annotated bibliography; however, you will be submitting a final draft in Week 4. Rubric Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion Format 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Question follows appropriate PICO format including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. B. Question is highly relevant to practice. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Question missing one direct element of question. B. Question is relevant to practice. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Research question does not follow PICO format. B. Question may not be relevant to practice. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of all content covered. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a deep understanding of the concept. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Demonstrates a solid grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Demonstrates a limited grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a limited understanding of the concept. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. All of the thought processes and content are clear. B. Understanding is evident. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient Most of the thought processes and content are clear, and understanding is evident. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited Some of the thought processes and content are confusing and unclear. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing and APA 10 to >6.0 pts Exemplary Few to no grammatical or mechanical errors. B. Near-perfect APA formatting. C. Meets reference requirements per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain all necessary information. 6 to >4.0 pts Proficient A. Some grammatical and mechanical errors. B. Some APA errors. C. Some reference requirements met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain most of the necessary information. 4 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Grammatical and mechanical errors throughout. B. Multiple APA errors. C. Reference requirements not met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries may be missing necessary information. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts Total Points: 100 3RD STEP OF ASSINGMENT DUE 1/25/2026 submit a revised draft of your evidence-based change proposal using the PICOT format (see WeeK Learning Objects page for a tutorial ) https://youtu.be/whXv-T6_ZQ0 . Please ensure you have reviewed and edited your annotated bibliography of all 10 peer-reviewed sources related to your proposed change. Please ensure your submission follows APA format Rubric Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Performance Task: PICO/Annotated Bibliography Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion Format 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Question follows appropriate PICO format including Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome. B. Question is highly relevant to practice. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Question missing one direct element of question. B. Question is relevant to practice. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Research question does not follow PICO format. B. Question may not be relevant to practice. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. Demonstrates a comprehensive grasp of all content covered. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a deep understanding of the concept. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient A. Demonstrates a solid grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a basic understanding of the concept. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Demonstrates a limited grasp of most of the content. B. Extension of key ideas demonstrates a limited understanding of the concept. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity 30 to >16.0 pts Exemplary A. All of the thought processes and content are clear. B. Understanding is evident. 16 to >8.0 pts Proficient Most of the thought processes and content are clear, and understanding is evident. 8 to >0.0 pts Limited Some of the thought processes and content are confusing and unclear. 0 pts No Marks 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing and APA 10 to >6.0 pts Exemplary Few to no grammatical or mechanical errors. B. Near-perfect APA formatting. C. Meets reference requirements per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain all necessary information. 6 to >4.0 pts Proficient A. Some grammatical and mechanical errors. B. Some APA errors. C. Some reference requirements met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries contain most of the necessary information. 4 to >0.0 pts Limited A. Grammatical and mechanical errors throughout. B. Multiple APA errors. C. Reference requirements not met per the prompt. D. Annotated entries may be missing necessary information. 0 pts No Marks 10 pts Total Points: 100