Sure, here’s a structured approach to create a 15-20 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes for evaluating two information technology products with a focus on safety and other important criteria.
### Slide 1: Title Slide
– **Title:** Assessing Product Safety: [Technology 1] vs. [Technology 2]
– **Subtitle:** [Your Organization’s Name]
– **Your Name**
– **Date**
### Slide 2: Introduction
– **Speaker Notes:** Provide an overview of the importance of technology in enhancing patient safety and improving clinical decisions.
### Slide 3: Selected Technologies
– **Title:** Overview of Technologies
– **Content:**
– Technology 1: [Product Name]
– Technology 2: [Product Name]
– **Speaker Notes:** Introduce both technologies, briefly describing their primary functions and purposes.
### Slide 4: Rationale for Selection
– **Title:** Rationale for Technology Selection
– **Content:**
– Why these technologies were selected.
– **Speaker Notes:** Discuss the reasons for choosing these two specific technologies, considering their relevance and potential benefits.
### Slide 5: Criteria for Evaluation
– **Title:** Criteria for Evaluation
– **Content:**
– Safety
– Ease of Use
– Integration with Existing Systems
– Training Requirements
– Scalability
– **Speaker Notes:** Explain why these criteria were selected as the most important for evaluating the products.
### Slide 6: Product Description – Technology 1
– **Title:** Product Description: [Technology 1]
– **Content:**
– Key features and functionalities.
– **Speaker Notes:** Provide a detailed description of Technology 1.
### Slide 7: Product Description – Technology 2
– **Title:** Product Description: [Technology 2]
– **Content:**
– Key features and functionalities.
– **Speaker Notes:** Provide a detailed description of Technology 2.
### Slide 8: Safety Comparison
– **Title:** Safety Comparison
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]: Safety features
– [Technology 2]: Safety features
– **Speaker Notes:** Compare and contrast the safety features of both technologies.
### Slide 9: Ease of Use
– **Title:** Ease of Use
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Discuss the user-friendliness of each product.
### Slide 10: Integration with Existing Systems
– **Title:** Integration Capabilities
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Explain how each product integrates with existing hospital systems.
### Slide 11: Training Requirements
– **Title:** Training Requirements
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Describe the training needed for each product.
### Slide 12: Scalability
– **Title:** Scalability
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Assess the ability of each product to scale with hospital growth.
### Slide 13: Strengths and Weaknesses
– **Title:** Strengths and Weaknesses
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– Strengths
– Weaknesses
– [Technology 2]
– Strengths
– Weaknesses
– **Speaker Notes:** Summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each product.
### Slide 14: Clinical Outcomes
– **Title:** Clinical Outcomes
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]: Outcomes and Evidence
– [Technology 2]: Outcomes and Evidence
– **Speaker Notes:** Discuss clinical outcomes associated with each product and supporting evidence.
### Slide 15: Product Integration
– **Title:** Product Integration
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]: Integration ease
– [Technology 2]: Integration ease
– **Speaker Notes:** Elaborate on how easily each product integrates with your hospital’s existing systems.
### Slide 16: Training and Expertise
– **Title:** Training and Expertise
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Detail any special training or expertise required to use each product.
### Slide 17: Scalability
– **Title:** Scalability and Future Needs
– **Content:**
– [Technology 1]
– [Technology 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Discuss whether the products can scale to meet the future needs of the hospital.
### Slide 18: Product Recommendation
– **Title:** Product Recommendation
– **Content:**
– Recommended Product: [Technology 1 or 2]
– **Speaker Notes:** Provide your final recommendation based on the evaluation criteria.
### Slide 19: Implementation Strategies
– **Title:** Implementation Strategies
– **Content:**
– Strategy 1
– Strategy 2
– **Speaker Notes:** Describe two ways to implement the chosen product.
### Slide 20: Evaluation Methods
– **Title:** Evaluation Methods
– **Content:**
– Method 1
– Method 2
– **Speaker Notes:** Describe two methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the product.
### Slide 21: Regulatory, Legal, and Ethical Issues
– **Title:** Regulatory, Legal, and Ethical Issues
– **Content:**
– Key considerations
– **Speaker Notes:** Address any relevant regulatory, legal, or ethical issues associated with the use of the product.
### Slide 22: Conclusion
– **Title:** Conclusion
– **Content:**
– Summary of findings and final thoughts
– **Speaker Notes:** Recap the main points of your presentation and reinforce your recommendation.
### Slide 23: References
– **Title:** References
– **Content:**
– List of references in APA format
– **Speaker Notes:** Ensure all sources are cited correctly according to APA guidelines.
### Example Products for Comparison
**Product 1: Epic Systems Corporation**
Epic is a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system widely used in healthcare settings for its robust features and interoperability.
**Product 2: Cerner Corporation**
Cerner is another leading EHR system known for its flexibility and ease of use, often compared with Epic.
### Peer-Reviewed Sources
1. *Article 1 Title*, Journal Name, Year.
2. *Article 2 Title*, Journal Name, Year.
3. *Article 3 Title*, Journal Name, Year.
### Example Detailed Speaker Notes for Slide 6
**Speaker Notes:**
Epic Systems Corporation is a widely recognized EHR solution used by numerous healthcare facilities globally. It offers a comprehensive suite of features including patient scheduling, clinical documentation, and revenue cycle management. The system is known for its interoperability, allowing seamless data exchange between different healthcare providers. Its robust analytics capabilities provide actionable insights to improve patient outcomes and operational efficiency. However, Epic’s implementation and customization can be complex and costly, requiring significant investment in training and support.
—
Ensure your presentation is visually engaging with graphics, charts, or images where appropriate, and that the speaker notes provide detailed context and explanation for each slide.
HSN/376: Health Information Technology For Nursing
Summative Assessment: Assessing Product Safety
Top of Form
Your organization has made it a priority that safety is taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. There is an opportunity to find an informatics or technology solution to improve the safety and overall well-being of patients.
Select an information technology you believe will benefit your organization. If your organization is currently using a similar product, you will compare the new technology to the one being used right now. For example, you have selected Epic for the electronic health record because your organization is currently using Meditech, which is outdated. In this case, you will compare Epic to Meditech.
If you have selected a technology your organization is not currently using, you will need to locate another one that is commercially equivalent to the one you selected. For example, your organization does not use integrated vital sign machines but you believe they will provide a significant benefit to the organization and you have selected Philips. You will need to locate another integrated vital sign machine, such as Vital Link to compare to.
Determine what 5 criteria are most important for evaluating the product, safety being foremost. Other possible criteria might be ease of use, clarity, time, etc.
Examine the 2 products and compare and contrast their strengths and weaknesses.
Evaluate the 2 products using the 5 criteria you determined to be the most important.
Create a 15- to 20-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes in which you:
· Provide a detailed description of the 2 products and include your rationale for selecting one brand over the others.
· Explain how the selected products could mitigate the administrative or clinical problem.
· Present the result of your product evaluation. Your product evaluation should answer the following required questions:
· What are the strengths and weaknesses of each product?
· How does each product compare when assessed on the 5 criteria you determined to be most important?
· What clinical outcomes are associated with each product? Is there evidence to support that the product is effective and safe?
· Will the product integrate easily with your hospital’s existing systems?
· Does the product require any special training or expertise to use?
· Can the product scale to meet the needs of your hospital as it grows?
· Which product would be best for your organization?
· Describe two ways you would implement the product.
· Describe two evaluation methods. Address any relevant regulatory, legal, or ethical issues as a result of using the product.
Include a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed sources. The product websites count toward this.
Cite your sources according to APA guidelines.
Note: References may include product websites or other reputable sources in addition to peer-reviewed resources. Faculty approval is required for sources other than peer-reviewed resources or the product website.
Important
**PowerPoint® presentation to ensure the slides only contain essential information and as little text as possible. Do not design a slide made up of long bullet points. Include detailed speaker notes for each slide of your presentation. Your speaker notes convey the details you would give if you were presenting.
**Reference needs to be within 5 years (2020-2024)
Bottom of Form
The post Assessing Product Safety: Epic vs. Cerner appeared first on Destiny Papers.
