BUS 225 Module Eight Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Many scholars write in journals, reflecting on their actions and decisions in their leadership roles. These reflections allow leaders to revisit their choices and learn how to improve their actions and decisions to become more effective leaders in the future. Reflecting on prior decisions is critical to learning success.
Directions
For this assignment, you will reflect on your four-part project and uncover what worked well and what areas you struggled with.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Successes: Determine what worked well.
- What worked well for this four-part project?
- Challenges: Determine what issues arose.
- What areas were challenging when reviewing this four-part project?
- Reflection: Reflect.
- What is your overall reflection on this four-part project?
What to Submit
Write a 1-page reflection on the four-part project, download your completed work, and submit it in Brightspace for instructor feedback. You should write using a professional voice, and any sources should be cited according to APA style. Your assignment must be between 300 and 500 words in length with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins.
AI Usage
If you use gen AI tools to support your work on this assignment, be sure to follow these AI usage guidelines. You must acknowledge your use of these tools in your work. Guidelines on how to cite AI tools can be found in this Shapiro Library guide.
Module Eight Assignment Rubric
| Criteria | Exceeds Expectations (100%) | Meets Expectations (85%) | Partially Meets Expectations (55%) | Does Not Meet Expectations (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Successes | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Determines what worked well during work on the four-part project | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include incomplete assessment of how the reflection achieved the project goals | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Challenges | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Determines what issues arose during work on the four-part project | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include incomplete assessment of how the reflection achieved the project goals | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Reflection | Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Reflects on the four-part project | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions | Does not attempt criterion | 25 |
| Clear Communication | Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding | Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience | Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding | Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication | 15 |
| Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 10 |
| Total: | 100% | ||||