There are a few things I think
would benefit from further
thought once your proposal is
submitted.
I think you need to take a step
back from this and rejig the
structure a little to present your
work in the best possible light.
Currently you have a lot of broken
up small points that make the
review look much more
superficial than it actually is. I
think you just need to take some
time to sort consolidate all those
‘bits’ into a bigger story.
1. Critical Analysis and Depth of
Relevant Literature and
Identification of Core
Concepts
Concepts are clearly identified,
but I think they require greater
depth of enquiry and discussion.
Criticality is all shoved into
section 1.1.10 in a very odd way
that feels a bit arbitrary.
2. Review of Significant
Literature, Drawing of Varied
Sources
There is a variety of material
nitan eama nuanllant enfaranone
OK
Okoth
Academic Expert · EssayPanel
Expert academic writer and education specialist helping students in the UK, USA, and Australia achieve their best results across all subjects.
Need help with your own assignment?
Our expert writers can help you apply everything you've just read — to your actual assignment, brief, and marking criteria.
Get Expert Help Now →← Previous
Review ot Signiticant Literature, Drawing of Varied Sources There is a variety of material cited, some excellent references located. Just make sure you don t have too many MDPI references. A few
Next →
Assessment Description You will complete a 5,000 – 6,000 word project proposal outlining the project you intend to undertake in Semester 2 and 3. This assessment follows AIAS Level 2 – Al Planning