|
XGBSHN5013 Applying Health and Social Care Policy, Ethics and Law Poster Presentation, Deadline: Friday, 14th February 2025 by noon |
|||
|
Assessment Pack Contents: Short introduction to the task Key terms Key resources Template to outline structure and content Rubric to understand marking criteria Video to explain it |
|||
|
Short Introduction to the Task: Design an academic poster which broadly explains what cultural competence is and its role in inclusive social policy – in particular the role it plays in enhancing policy and practice. Word Count: The presentation should be 10 minutes in length with 5 minutes set aside for questions and answers (from your peers and tutor). Referencing: Please use the APA referencing guidelines. |
|||
|
Key Terms: Explain the importance of culturally competent practice in supporting equality, diversity and inclusive health and social care practice when interpreting relevant legislation, policy, or statutory guidance in practice. You will present your poster to peers and have the opportunity to defend it with Q & A. |
|||
|
Key Resources: The tasks are all found on Moodle for you to complete. |
|||
|
Template: Please include these 5 sections in your poster (you can put relevant pictures/figures of your choice). |
|||
|
|
Sections |
Explanation |
|
|
|
Section 1: Explanation of what cultural competence is and how the idea emerged |
What is cultural competence? How did the idea emerge? |
|
|
|
Section 2: Relevance of cultural competence in health and social care |
What are its key components? Why is it so important for health and social care practice? |
|
|
|
Section 3: Evaluation of the usefulness of cultural competence in your chosen area |
Identify an appropriate area of practice – How is cultural competence relevant to this area? What might be the main barriers or challenges? How are/might they be overcome? |
|
|
|
Section 4: Legislations and policies |
Identify and comment on some of the legislation |
|
|
|
|
and policies related to cultural competence. |
|
|
|
|
Section 5: References |
List all the references in APA format. |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
1. Knowledge and understanding (30%) |
Awareness of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice. |
||
|
|
2. Structure and argument (30%) |
Overall argument makes connections between all ideas logically. |
||
|
|
3. Analysis (20%) |
Identified an appropriate area of practice and makes connection between the area of practice and the relevance of considering cultural competence is relevant to this area. A clear evaluation of the usefulness of cultural competence in the chosen area and an acknowledgement of the relevance of legislation/policy to support the need for culturally competent practice. |
||
|
|
4. Sources and evidence/ adherence to referencing convention (10%) |
Use of supporting literature Reference list provided. Background reading. APA referencing style used |
||
|
|
5. Clarity, presentation style and communication (10%) |
Development of presentation using relevant IT and digital skills. Verbal communication throughout the presentation. Evidence of effective preparation and related research. Good response to questions |
||
|
Rubric used to mark: 1. Knowledge and understanding (30%) 100, 95, 92 A highly robust awareness of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation. 88, 85, 82 A well-defined meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation. |
||||
78, 75, 72
A very good discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
68, 65, 62
A good discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
58, 55, 52
A useful discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
48, 45, 42
A basic discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
38, 35, 32
An inappropriate discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
25, 20, 10, 0
No appropriate discussion of the meaning of cultural competence, its components and how the idea emerged and its importance in health and social care practice is identified in the poster presentation.
2. Structure and argument (30%)
100, 95, 92
Exceptionally creative and innovative supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Effective and over-arching argument of all elements (cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and a focus on ethic/policy/law) are integrated effectively into the argument.
88, 85, 82
Highly creative and innovative supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Overall and insightful argument of all elements (cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and a focus on ethic/policy/law are integrated into the argument to a commendable extent.
78, 75, 72
Very creative and innovative supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Clear and logical argument of all elements (cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and a focus on ethic/policy/law are integrated very well into the argument.
68, 65, 62
Creative and innovative supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Focused argument of most elements (cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and a focus on ethic/policy/law) are integrated effectively into the argument.
58, 55, 52
Somewhat well though-out supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Fair argument with some elements integrated into the argument One or more components of – cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and a focus on ethic/policy/law – has not been weaved into the argument effectively.
48, 45, 42
Basic supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Limited and weak argument of just one element is present in the argument. For example, may have only focused on cultural competence but not explored an area of practice nor on focus on ethic/policy/law.
38, 35, 32
Limited supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
Lack of argument with no clear element of the task present. It is unclear how a focus on cultural competence, or a specific area of health and social care practice or ethics/policy/law come into the frame.
25, 20, 10, 0
Very limited or no supporting presentation materials/activities are used to structure the basis of the presentation.
There is no argument and lack of understanding of the task. No focus on cultural competence, a specific area of health and social care practice and/or a focus on ethic/policy/law.
3. Analysis (20%)
100, 95, 92
Highly insightful and fully exemplified analysis of the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area and links this to relevant wider health and social care policy.
88, 85, 82
Thorough and well exemplified analysis of the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area and links this to relevant wider health and social care policy.
78, 75, 72
Clear, detailed and well exemplified analysis of the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area and links this to relevant wider health and social care policy.
68, 65, 62
Very good analysis with a range of appropriate examples outlining the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area and links this to relevant wider health and social care policy.
58, 55, 52
Fairly argued analysis with a range of appropriate examples outlining the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area of practice and attempts to links this to relevant for wider health and social care policy.
48, 45, 42
Reasonable analysis with some appropriate examples outlining the partial relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area of practice and attempts to links this to relevant for wider health and social care policy.
38, 35, 32
Brief analysis with limited not always appropriate for outlining the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area of practice. There is no attempt to links this to relevant for wider health and social care policy.
25, 20, 10, 0
No analysis and no examples outlining the relevance of cultural competence in the context of a chosen area of practice. There is no attempt to links this to relevant for wider health and social care policy.
4. Sources and evidence/adherence to referencing convention (10%) 100, 95, 92
A wide range of high-quality supporting literature used with a reference list provided with extensive background reading.
APA referencing style used with no errors.
88, 85, 82
High quality supporting literature used with a reference list provided with background reading. APA referencing style used but with mainly few errors. Academic writing is excellent.
78, 75, 72
Supporting literature used with a reference list provided with background reading. APA referencing style used but with mainly minor errors.
68, 65, 62
Some supporting literature. A reference list is provided with some background reading. APA referencing style used but with mainly minor errors.
58, 55, 52
Little supporting literature. Lack of reference list. Lack of background reading. APA referencing style used but with major errors.
48, 45, 42
Little if any referencing. Lack of/or incomplete reference list. Lack of background reading. APA referencing style not used.
38, 35, 32
No referencing. Lack of/or incomplete reference list. Lack of background reading. APA referencing style not used.
25, 20, 10, 0
No refence list provided. Harvard referencing style not used. No evidence of supporting literature or background reading.
5. Clarity, presentation style and communication (10%) 100, 95, 92
Exceptional verbal communication throughout the presentation. Extensive evidence of effective preparation and related research. Excellent response to questions.
88, 85, 82
Very good verbal communication throughout the presentation.
Very good evidence of effective preparation and related research apparent. Very good response to questions.
78, 75, 72
Good verbal communication throughout the presentation. Good evidence of effective preparation and related research apparent. Good response to questions.
68, 65, 62
Satisfactory verbal communication throughout the presentation, generally good evidence of effective preparation and related research apparent Generally good response to questions.
58, 55, 52
Somewhat satisfactory verbal communication throughout the presentation, Some evidence of effective preparation and related research apparent Satisfactory response to questions.
48, 45, 42
Basic verbal communication throughout the presentation, unequally. Limited evidence of effective preparation and related research apparent. Basic response to questions.
38, 35, 32
Poor verbal communication throughout the presentation. Little evidence of effective preparation.
Limited response to questions.
25, 20, 10, 0
Very poor verbal communication throughout the presentation. Very little evidence of effective preparation.
Very limited response to questions
