Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

In March 2024, federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) executed search warrants at Sean “Diddy” Combs’ properties in Los Angeles and Miami. The search warrant

 Motion to Suppress

  • Due Tuesday by 11:59pm 
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
  • Jul 29 at 11:59pm

1. Search Warrants Executed at Combs’ Properties:

  • In March 2024, federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) executed search warrants at Sean “Diddy” Combs’ properties in Los Angeles and Miami.
  • The search warrants were related to an ongoing sex trafficking investigation, according to law enforcement sources.
  • The warrants were out of the Southern District of New York.
  • Combs was in the Miami area when the searches were executed. 

2. Items Seized During the Searches:

  • Law enforcement officers seized “three AR-15s with defaced serial numbers, as well as a drum magazine” from Combs’ residences.
  • Phones were seized from Combs in Miami before he was scheduled to depart for a trip to the Bahamas. 

3. Legal Challenges to the Searches:

  • Combs’ lawyers are challenging the search warrants and aiming to suppress evidence found during the searches.
  • They argue that the warrant applications were overbroad, excluded facts that could have been favorable to Combs, and presented a distorted picture of reality. 

4. Search of Combs’ Jail Cell:

  • While Combs was in jail, investigators searched his cell as part of a “larger safety and security initiative” at the facility.
  • The government claims the search was scheduled before Combs’ arrest and was not targeted at him.
  • Items such as a manila folder marked “legal”, a notebook, an address book, and personal effects were found in Combs’ cell.
  • Photos were taken of the notebook and address book but were not removed from his cell. 

Instructions:  Apply relevant procedural rules (e.g., Fourth Amendment, Miranda) and draft a draft a motion to suppress evidence, identifying the specific procedural rule violated by the police and arguing why the evidence should be excluded. 

 

Scroll to Top