Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Module 5: Deming Cycle Instructions: 1.      Using the Deming cycle ( Plan, Do, Study, and Act), develop a recorded PowerPoint

Module 5: Deming Cycle

Instructions:

1.      Using the Deming cycle ( Plan, Do, Study, and Act), develop a recorded PowerPoint presentation using Canvas Studio’s Screen Capture feature to record (voice-over) it.

2.      During your presentation, you may describe the cycle and demonstrate how to implement it in your practice with a sample

Be sure to review the academic expectations for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

·        Follow the instructions below to capture a screen recording of your presentation using PowerPoint or ScreenPal:

o   Guide to Screen-Recording a Presentation with PowerPoint Download Guide to Screen-Recording a Presentation with PowerPoint(PDF)

§  You can access Microsoft technical support for additional details:
Microsoft Support. (n.d.). Record a slide show with narration and slide timings.Links to an external site. Microsoft.

o   Guide to Screen-Recording a Presentation with ScreenPal Download Guide to Screen-Recording a Presentation with ScreenPal(PDF)

§  You can access ScreenPal technical support for additional details:

The ScreenPal Team. (2024, February 22). The ultimate guide on how to screen record.Links to an external site. ScreenPal.

·        Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

·        Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

·        Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. 

 

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent100% of the presentation (live or
recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of
the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and
examples.

36 to >32.0 ptsGoodMost of the presentation (live or
recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of
the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and
examples.

32 to >28.0 ptsFairSome of the presentation (live or
recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the
topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples.

28 to >24.0 ptsPoorMost of the presentation (live or
recorded) does not align with the information requested. It shows incomplete
mastery of the topic or task by providing limited or poor information,
details, and examples.

24 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication

Oral Presentation, Recorded Narrative, or Scripted Notes

20 to >18.0 ptsExcellentOral presentation (live or recorded)
is fluid, free of grammatical errors, and well paced. The message is
transmitted flawlessly, and the audience is captivated and able to follow the
presentation step by step. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for
presentation in the notes is exceptional, effectively tells the story, or
communicates key points from the slide.

18 to >16.0 ptsGoodOral presentation (live or recorded)
has a few grammatical errors or pacing issues. Issues do not interfere with
reception of the content. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for
presentation in the notes effectively tells the story or communicates key
points from the slide.

16 to >14.0 ptsFairOral presentation has significant
grammatical issues, interfering with the reception of the content OR (for
non-presented assignments). Script for presentation reiterates the content on
the slide without any additional information. If this was presented, it would
appear that the presenter was reading the slides to the audience. OR (for
non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes fairly tell
the story or communicates basic key points from the slide.

14 to >12.0 ptsPoorPresentation is very difficult to
understand, either as the result of the presentation or technological issues
causing interference OR (for non-presented assignments) the script for the
presentation in the notes appears to be unrelated to the content on the
slide.

12 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Materials and Visual
Presentation

30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentPresentation has a highly
professional, appealing appearance. Supporting visuals may include images,
graphs, or charts and are exceptional and appropriate to the message being
presented. Slides are well formatted with the proper amount of text,
leveraging heading and body styles. The colors and style are consistent
throughout. The visuals and the oral message are well-balanced.

27 to >24.0 ptsGoodPresentation has a professional
appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being
presented. Slides are well formatted with appropriate graphics and font size.
The colors and style are consistent throughout.

24 to >21.0 ptsFairPresentation has a professional
appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being
presented. There are some inconsistencies with formatting, colors, and style,
but the overall presentation is developing and looks fair.

21 to >18.0 ptsPoorSlides have some severe issues with
inconsistent or unnecessary graphics or too much text on the slides. The
visuals are overall appropriate to the message being presented.

18 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe assignment did not reflect the
requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics and Grammar

10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentSlides are entirely free of typos,
spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors.

9 to >8.0 ptsGoodSlides have minimal (1 – 3) typographical,
spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 to >7.0 ptsFairSlides have multiple (4 -7)
typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

7 to >6.0 ptsPoorSlides have more than severe (8-10)
typos, spelling, grammar or translation issues. (A presentation will distract
from the message if these issues are present.

6 to >0 ptsUnacceptableSlides are unacceptable (11 or more)
typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors,
and/or the assignment was not submitted.

10 pts

Total Points: 100

 

Scroll to Top