NR 505 Week 6 DQ How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?

NR 505 Week 6 DQ How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?

NR 505 Week 6 DQ How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?

Research ethics are a fundamental part of having validity and reliable as well as credible findings for dissemination to improve care delivery and nursing practice through evidence-based practice (EBP). As discovered through the history of research, the conduct and actions of researchers has become a core aspect of regulations, especially the need to show respect for the overall ethical rules and social norms (Veatch et al., 2019). Imperatively, learning about the history of research has had an impact on perspective about biomedical research. Evidence from botched studies like the Tuskegee trials on syphilis demonstrate that researchers should uphold biomedical principles and protect individual rights. It is important to protect the rights than getting data and evidence which may not be effective for dissemination (Mardani et al., 2019). Important ethical questions emerge concerning the participation of research subjects who become objects of analysis. The implication is that researchers should uphold the biomedical principles of autonomy through informed consent, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

Based on the reviewed studies of the PICIT question, what emerges is that researchers adequately protect the rights of human subjects, in most of the investigations. However, using systematic reviewed articles may not provide a concise perspective of the issue since the researchers do not need original data but only leverage the one obtained from the studies. Consequently, additional measure would be fundamental in addressing issues related to ethical conduct and principles. Imperatively, researchers should adhere to all provisions on ethical requirements, even when doing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (White, 2020). Researchers should interpret the ethical requirements uniformly to reduce and prevent gaps in application of requirements to protect patients and attain credibility of their findings. They must demonstrate a commitment to bioethical principles and provide sufficient information for the participants to make better decisions and choices concerning participation in the studies.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 505 Week 6 DQ How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?:

NR 505 Week 6 DQ How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research? References

Mardani, A., Nakhoda, M., Noruzi, A., & Gooshki, E. S. (2019). Ethical considerations in the

biomedical research: analysis of national biomedical research ethics guidelines in Iran. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6642447/pdf/JMEHM-12-4.pdf

Veatch, R. M., & Guidry-Grimes, L. K. (2019). The basics of bioethics (4th ed.). Routledge.

White, M. G. (2020). Why human subjects research protection is important. Ochsner journal,

            20(1), 16-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.5012

Purpose

Respond to the following prompts: 

How has learning about the history of research ethics impacted your view of biomedical research?
In looking at the studies you reviewed for your PICOT question, do you feel that today’s researchers adequately protect the rights of human subjects? If not, what additional measures do you recommend?