NRSG 311 Unit 5 Discussion
NRSG 311 Unit 5 Discussion
Learning Reflection
The importance of health information technology in patient care and quality outcomes has become the focal point in healthcare. During this study period, I have learned the critical role of nursing informatics in the management and utilization of data and other health IT systems to create improvements for quality care (Moore et al., 2020). Over the weeks, I have learned several interesting topics on nursing informatics.
The first topic I found interesting was implementing and evaluating a health technology or information system. Many health systems and software are being implemented in healthcare and the success of these projects depends on the effective implementation process. Additionally, evaluation of the implemented systems is also critical when implementing a project. The evaluation process ensures that the health IT meets the intended goals and that the project is feasible (Hebda et al., 2018). Evaluation is also part of monitoring an implemented system to ensure continuous improvement to attain quality excellence. The second topic that has been intriguing in this course was the evaluation of evidence for credibility and quality of information. Websites are useful tools for information, but not every piece of information is credible and reliable.
The opportunity to interact with classmates through online discussion is another memorable aspect of the course. The discussion brought together varied perspectives, which enabled me to have an open mind, enhancing my understanding of the discussion topics. Additionally, the discussions enabled in-depth analysis of the topics for a better understanding. Group work could have been another valuable approach for gaining an additional understanding of the course topics.
As I complete the course, what I have learned provides a valuable foundation in informatics and insights on how to integrate health information and health IT systems. I will use the information gained to advocate for the implementation of information technology in healthcare for quality improvement and patient safety. I would also the information to research databases for quality evidence to apply in evidence-based practice.
NRSG 311 Unit 5 Discussion References
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar , P. (2018). Handbook of Informatics for Nurses & Healthcare Professionals 6th Edition. Pearson.
Moore, E. C., Tolley, C., Bates, D., & Slight, S. (2020). A systematic review of the impact of health information technology on nurses’ time. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(5), 798–807, https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz231.
Assignment Description
Primary Discussion Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).
Summative Discussion Board
Review and reflect on the informatics knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 3 paragraphs on the following:
What were the most compelling topics related to informatics learned in this course?
How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?
What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?
Provide an example of how this course will change your future nursing practice as it relates to informatics or technology.
The Main Post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NRSG 311 Unit 5 Discussion:
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about his or her Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:
What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
NRSG 311 Unit 5 Discussion Rubric
The Discussion Board Grading rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the discussion. This discussion board grading rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component for the discussion. It is the road map that can help lead your discussion. Discussion Board Grading Rubric
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Discussion Board RubricExpectationWeight% Score EarnedCommentsSupport From Literature: Support from current literature (less than 5 years old) is present and includes a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation and matching reference for each topic. 20%20% Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from healthcare field.30%30% Organization: Post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to discussion topic.20%20% Interactive Dialogue: Responds substantively to two posts from student peers that are topic-related. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.20%20% Grammar, Syntax, APA: APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate or with no errors. 10%10% Total Percentage100%100% Possible Points50 Points Earned50
