NSG 6101 Week 2 Qualitative Annotated Bibliography
NSG 6101 Week 2 Qualitative Annotated Bibliography
Midweek Assignment
Opiate overdose has consistently increased in the last decades and is currently an epidemic. Indeed, deaths due to overdose have more than tripled in the last two decades, with close to 75% of such deaths involving opioids (Singh et al.,2019). Therefore, there is always a need to use better means to control the problem. The coming of the covid-19 pandemic brought various challenges related to the opiate overdose crisis. Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to create a qualitative annotated bibliography regarding the identified issue, which was the opiate overdose crisis in the wake of covid-19 pandemic.
Annotated Bibliography
Lockard, R., Priest, K. C., Gregg, J., & Buchheit, B. M. (2022). A qualitative study of patient experiences with telemedicine opioid use disorder treatment during COVID-19. Substance Abuse, 43(1), 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2022.2060447
This article was authored with the major aim of qualitatively exploring the gains and losses made in virtual patient engagements for individuals with opioid use disorder during the covid-19 pandemic. This scope of the study covered patients who have encountered an opioid overdose crisis. The study was conducted in such a way that patients would be part of the study if they got care at the Harm reduction and Bridges to Care clinic and used virtual consultations during the study period. Semi-structured interviews were used in the research and given to the research subjects. Dual coding was also done to the interviews, and analysis was accomplished through direct content analysis. The results obtained revealed various aspects that support the identified problem. For example, the patient indicated that the virtual visits were a critical and valuable option for getting the services they needed during the covid-19 pandemic. Some participants preferred face-to-face engagements, while others preferred virtual ones. So virtual visits played a key role in the management of the problem during the pandemic. One of the possible biases of the research includes the limited number of study participants. The researchers observed that the patient was for flexibility regarding the choices they make on the engagement modality.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NSG 6101 Week 2 Qualitative Annotated Bibliography:
Galarneau, L. R., Hilburt, J., O’Neill, Z. R., Buxton, J. A., Scheuermeyer, F. X., Dong, K., … & Kestler, A. (2021). Experiences of people with opioid use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 16(7), e0255396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255396.
This research was done with the main purpose of exploring the experiences of individuals experiencing opioid overdose during the Covid-19 pandemic so that better programs that serve them could be formulated. The scope of the project entailed obtaining the participants’ views and experiences. This research was done using semi-structured qualitative interviews based on the grounded theory. The researchers carried out the interviews to reach theme saturation, upon which the emerging themes codebook was created. A total of nineteen participants were recruited to take part in the study. The study findings are also significant and contribute to the subject under consideration. For example, the participants noted that the fear connected to covid-19 led to a reluctance to help reverse the overdose. Some also engaged in more overdose and frequent use to help replace the activities they could not do due to the pandemic. One of the shortcomings is the potential lack of generalizability. The researchers concluded that covid-19 pandemic had a substantial impact on patients engaging in overdose. This research lends evidence to support the identified problem since it shows that covid-19 impacted negatively on efforts used in fighting the opiate overdose crisis.
Conclusion
Opiate overdose crisis impact negatively on individuals’ lives, hence a need to use better strategies for managing. The articles explored showed that covid-19 brought challenges to the efforts used in fighting the issue. Even though telehealth was used, it can not be as effective as face-to-face engagement.
NSG 6101 Week 2 Qualitative Annotated Bibliography References
Galarneau, L. R., Hilburt, J., O’Neill, Z. R., Buxton, J. A., Scheuermeyer, F. X., Dong, K., … & Kestler, A. (2021). Experiences of people with opioid use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 16(7), e0255396. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255396.
Lockard, R., Priest, K. C., Gregg, J., & Buchheit, B. M. (2022). A qualitative study of patient experiences with telemedicine opioid use disorder treatment during COVID-19. Substance Abuse, 43(1), 1155-1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2022.2060447
Singh, G. K., Kim, I. E., Girmay, M., Perry, C., Daus, G. P., Vedamuthu, I. P., … & Allender, M. (2019). Opioid epidemic in the United States: empirical trends, and a literature review of social determinants and epidemiological, pain management, and treatment patterns. International Journal of Maternal and Child Health and AIDS, 8(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.21106%2Fijma.284
For this assignment you will continue to review current research from South’s Online Library and provide a critical evaluation on that research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a brief summary and analysis of the journal article reviewed. For more information on annotated bibliographies please visit Purdue’s OWL: Purdue Online Writing Lab
A total of two annotated bibliographies are to be submitted (not to exceed one page each). The articles must come from nursing scholarly literature and may not be older than 5 years since publication. Please note that the articles must be research based and reflect a qualitative methodology (review our reading assignments). Web pages, magazines, textbooks, and other books are not acceptable.
Each annotation must address the following critical elements:
Explanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work
Brief description of the research conducted
Value and significance of the work (e.g., study’s findings, scope of the research project) as a contribution to the subject under consideration
Possible shortcomings or bias in the work
Conclusions or observations reached by the author
Summary as to why this research lends evidence to support the potential problem identified specific to your role specialization.
Submissions Area:
Please submit to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Due Date