NURS-4006 Week 1: Assignment EMERGING AND RE-EMERGING DISEASES FACT SHEET – assignmenthandlers

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Provided a fully developed description of the audience and history of an emerging/reemerging disease with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

26 to >23.0 pts

Proficient

Provided a developed description of the audience and history of an emerging/reemerging disease with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

23 to >20.0 pts

Basic

Provided a minimally developed description of the audience and history of an emerging/reemerging disease with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

20 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided an under-developed description of the audience and history of an emerging/reemerging disease with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Provided a fully developed description of the implications of the spread of the disease and included statistical data with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

26 to >23.0 pts

Proficient

Provided a developed description of the implications of the spread of the disease and included statistical data with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

23 to >20.0 pts

Basic

Provided a minimally-developed description of the implications of the spread of the disease and included statistical data with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

20 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided an under-developed description of the implications of the spread of the disease and included statistical data with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Provided a fully developed description of how to detect the disease and how to prevent the spread of the disease with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

26 to >23.0 pts

Proficient

Provided a developed description of how to detect the disease and how to prevent the spread of the disease with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

23 to >20.0 pts

Basic

Provided a minimally-developed description of how to detect the disease and how to prevent the spread of the disease with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

20 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided an under-developed description of how to detect the disease and how to prevent the spread of the disease with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Provided a fully developed description of how the disease is treated with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

26 to >23.0 pts

Proficient

Provided a developed description of how the disease is treated with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

23 to >20.0 pts

Basic

Provided a minimally-developed description of how the disease is treated with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

20 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided an under-developed description of how the disease is treated with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic

Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic

Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.

8 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.

7 to >6.0 pts

Basic

Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.

6 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference.