Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark (2019)
Hover and Williams (2022)
Lee and Miller (2022)
McDermott, Bernard, and Hathaway (2021)
*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Part 2
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you completed above. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.
The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):
Change Implementation and Management Plan
Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.
Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.
Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:
An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
A description of the change being proposed
Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
A plan for communicating the change you propose
A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
**Part 1: Work Environment Assessment**
**Results of the Work Environment Assessment:**
Upon completion of the Work Environment Assessment, several key findings emerged regarding the health and civility of the workplace. The assessment revealed a concerning lack of communication and collaboration among team members, resulting in strained interpersonal relationships and decreased morale. Additionally, the assessment highlighted issues related to workload imbalance and inadequate support for employee well-being, leading to increased stress and burnout among staff members.
**Surprising Results and Confirmation of Preconceived Idea:**
Two surprising findings from the assessment were the extent of dissatisfaction among employees regarding communication and collaboration and the high levels of stress reported by staff members. These findings underscore the critical need for addressing these issues to promote a healthier and more positive work environment. One preconceived idea that was confirmed by the assessment was the importance of organizational leadership in fostering a supportive and respectful workplace culture. The assessment reaffirmed the significant impact of leadership behavior on employee engagement and satisfaction.
**Implications of Assessment Results:**
The results of the assessment suggest that the workplace is currently experiencing challenges related to communication breakdowns, workload pressures, and employee well-being. These issues not only contribute to decreased productivity and morale but also pose risks to the overall health and civility of the workplace. Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort to foster open communication, equitable workload distribution, and supportive leadership practices.
**Part 2: Reviewing the Literature**
**Theory or Concept Presented in the Article:**
One relevant article selected for review is Clark (2019), which discusses the importance of psychological safety in promoting effective teamwork and organizational performance. The article emphasizes the role of trust, mutual respect, and open communication in creating a psychologically safe work environment where team members feel comfortable taking interpersonal risks and expressing their ideas and concerns without fear of reprisal.
**Relation to Work Environment Assessment Results:**
The concept of psychological safety presented in Clark (2019) aligns closely with the findings of the Work Environment Assessment, particularly regarding the challenges related to communication breakdowns and strained interpersonal relationships. The assessment results underscore the need for fostering psychological safety within the workplace to promote open dialogue, collaboration, and mutual support among team members.
**Application of Theory to Improve Organizational Health:**
To address the communication and collaboration challenges identified in the assessment, the organization could implement strategies aimed at enhancing psychological safety. This may include leadership training programs focused on fostering trust and creating a supportive work environment, as well as team-building activities designed to promote open communication and collaboration. Additionally, establishing channels for feedback and dialogue can help address concerns and build trust among team members, ultimately contributing to improved organizational health and stronger work teams.
**Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies**
**Strategies to Address Shortcomings:**
Implement regular team meetings or huddles to facilitate communication and collaboration among team members.
Provide training and resources for effective workload management and stress reduction techniques to support employee well-being.
**Strategies to Bolster Successful Practices:**
Recognize and celebrate achievements and milestones to reinforce positive behavior and foster a culture of appreciation.
Encourage cross-functional collaboration and knowledge sharing to leverage diverse perspectives and expertise within the organization.
**Conclusion:**
By implementing evidence-based strategies informed by the assessment findings and relevant literature, the organization can address existing challenges, promote a healthier work environment, and enhance team effectiveness and performance. These proactive measures will not only improve employee satisfaction and well-being but also contribute to organizational success and resilience in the long term.
The post Part 1: Work Environment Assessment appeared first on Destiny Papers.
