project 1. Incorporating Theory and Change Model 2. Project Objectives and Goals include the National Quality Standard and AACN Essential by referring to previous writings within your discussions 3. Literature Review (written in narra

project 1. Incorporating Theory and Change Model 2. Project Objectives and Goals include the National Quality Standard and AACN Essential by referring to previous writings within your discussions 3. Literature Review (written in narrative form with the addition of your literature review table as an appendix) **For an exemplar of the narrative format of a literature review Incorporating Theory and Change Model (Nursing practice, and more importantly, changes in nursing practice should be shaped by a perspective grounded in its science, whether from the arts, humanities, or other sciences. I love how Walker and Avant (2019) define theoretical perspectives as “building blocks” which differentiate nursing as a task-oriented career from nursing as a distinguished profession. Without even realizing it, you practice as a nurse with some kind of theoretical foundation, and essentially, you have become an expander of such theory or theories. When preparing your EBP project, reflect on what theory or theorist can provide your project with a solid foundation; sturdy enough to withstand a changing healthcare climate, while also allowing you to draw from the theory to generate new knowledge). Make a copy of the above template and complete a literature review with a minimum of 10 peer-reviewed studies to support or argue your evidence-based practice change. All must be dated within the past 5 years unless referenced as seminal work. Rubric Performance Task Rubric: Essay (1) Performance Task Rubric: Essay (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Style and APA 30 to >25.4 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Includes paragraph transitions. B. Appropriate tone. C. Range in sentence structure. D. Correct use of punctuation and capitalization. E. Appropriate use of grammar. F. Follows APA guidelines, including at least three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years 25.4 to >20.9 pts Meets Expectations A. Consistency in writing at a scholarly level. B. Follows some APA guidelines (may have less than three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years) 20.9 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Not written at an acceptable level for a scholar. B. Little to no use of APA guidelines (references do not reflect peer-reviewed materials published in the last five years) 0 pts No Marks Demonstrates overt use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) text generation 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking and Independent Thought 20 to >16.9 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Understands central concept(s). B. Identifies salient arguments. C. Thoughtfully evaluates major alternative points of view. D. Appropriate synthesis of literature. E. Addresses all prompts in a thorough manner. 16.9 to >15.0 pts Meets Expectations A. Compares and contrasts perspectives. B. Summarizes the concepts. C. Follows where evidence and reasons lead. D. Offers a synopsis of the literature using minimal direct quotes. E. Addresses all prompts. 15 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Misinterprets evidence. B. Fails to identify relevant counter-arguments. C. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. D. Reiterates what is shown in the literature using many direct quotes. E. No evidence of synthesis. F. Does not address all prompts. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence-Based Theory and Practice 20 to >16.9 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Application to professional practice is evident. B. Uses sufficient peer-reviewed/scholarly sources. C. Documents sources to support research assertions. 16.9 to >13.9 pts Meets Expectations A. Theories supported by evidence or citations. B. Integrates readings and literature. C. Includes sufficient peer-reviewed sources. 13.9 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Little attempt to place details in context. B. Little to no use of broader ideas or theories. C. Uses non-scholarly references. 0 pts Not Present 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relevance to Profession 15 to >12.74 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Analyzes implications for the institution, the larger context, and personal professional growth. B. Demonstrates best practices in profession. C. Communicates the importance of vision and mission. D. Demonstrates value for organizational success. 12.74 to >10.4 pts Meets Expectations A. Connection to personal experience is evident. B. Includes implications for the profession, the larger context, and professional growth. C. Analyzes implications for the institution or organization. D. Relates best practices. E. Connections between vision/mission and application are present. 10.4 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Does not explain implications of learning with the profession, the larger context, or professional growth. B. Does not analyze implications for the profession. C. Does not acknowledge best practices. D. Fails to consider vision/mission or role of leadership. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Application 15 to >12.74 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Creates new ideas based upon previous knowledge and experiences. B. Relates knowledge to draw insightful conclusions. C. Transitions ideas into real-life application. 12.74 to >10.4 pts Meets Expectations A. Application of knowledge and experience is evident. B. Uses knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Connects ideas to real-life application. 10.4 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Significant omission of required components. B. Does not relate knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Does not transition ideas into real-life application. 0 pts Not Present 15 pts Total Points: 100