Strategic Workforce Development Talent Drain Case Study Assignment | PC

Instructions:

Case Study Topic: Talent Drain and Workforce Development in
Malaysia for the Technology Sector
All citations must come from Google Scholar
Can use Scimagojr to check the general ranking of the journal to support the statement
APA reference must be used for any citation made
You may apply the VRIO (Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organisation) Framework, Core Competencies Analysis or SWOT analysis to analyse the issue.
The report should be 1.5-spaced, with 1-inch margins and a standard font (e.g., Times New Roman, 12 pt).

Proposed Write-Up of Case Study:

Chapter 1:

Introduction

Background
Problem Statement
Research Objectives
Research Questions
Significance of the Study
Scope of the Study

Chapter Two:

Literature Review

Review of key literature on chronological order, with literature from recent years must be included.

Highlights of the key concepts or theories used as the lens for the study
A clear formation of the study’s story using a top-down approach i.e. an umbrella perspective that looks at a general story before narrowing it down to specifics
Highlights of the research hypotheses formation

Chapter Three:

Research Methodology

Research Design
Study Population, Unit of Analysis,
Sample Selection and Sampling Techniques
Data Collection and Analysis Methods
Ethical consideration
Findings
Recommendations
Limitation of the study
Conclusion

Individual Assignment: Case Analysis (30%)

Objective: The purpose of this assignment is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the critical components involved in designing a case study. You will utilise a checklist to assess the design of a case study of your choice, ensuring that all necessary elements are effectively addressed.

Assignment Instructions

Select a Case Study:

Choose a real-world case study relevant to a field of interest (e.g., business, healthcare, education, social sciences, financials).
Briefly summarise the case, including its context and main issues.

Complete the Case Study Design Checklist:

Use the provided checklist to evaluate the case study you selected. Your analysis should address each element of the checklist in detail.
Provide specific examples and references from the case study to support your analysis.

Written Report:

Prepare a written report that includes your evaluation based on the checklist. Your report should be organised clearly, with headings for each section.

Case Study Design Checklist

The Case and Its Units of Analysis

Clearly define the case. What is the main focus, and what are the specific units of analysis (e.g., individuals, groups, organizations)?
How are the units of analysis relevant to the research questions?

Clear Objectives and Preliminary Research Questions/Hypotheses

What are the objectives of the case study? What specific outcomes are you aiming to achieve?
Formulate preliminary research questions or hypotheses that will guide your inquiry. How do these relate to the case?

Theoretical Basis

Discuss the theoretical framework that underpins the case study. What theories or models are being applied, and how do they inform your understanding of the case?
How does the theoretical basis enhance the analysis of the case?

Adequately Defined Case

Is the case well-defined? Provide a rationale for your choice of the case and how it fits within the broader context of your research area.

Cause-Effect Relations

Identify any cause-and-effect relationships presented in the case. How are these relationships demonstrated through data or examples in the case study?

Involvement of Data from Multiple Sources

Analyse the data sources used in the case study. Are multiple sources of data (e.g., interviews, surveys, documents) utilised? How does this strengthen the findings?
Discuss any potential biases or limitations of the data sources.

Integrity of Individuals/Organisations

Consider ethical implications in the case study. How are the rights and integrity of individuals or organisations addressed?
Are there any confidentiality concerns, and how are they managed?

Findings: to include but not limited to:-

Factual Results

Concrete data or evidence gathered (e.g., test results, interview summaries, financial records, observation notes).
Chronological or thematic presentation of events.

Patterns or Trends Observed

A. Any recurring issues, behaviours, or themes identified from the data.

Direct Quotes or Observations (if applicable)

B. In qualitative case studies, include relevant quotes or field notes.

Key Metrics or Measurements

C. Statistics or performance indicators that are relevant to the case.

Relevant Documents or Records

D. Summaries or excerpts of important documents reviewed during the analysis.

Stakeholder Input

E. Summarised viewpoints or concerns raised by people involved (e.g., employees, customers, managers).

Get the Solution to this Assessment

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Recommendations

Provides actionable suggestions or solutions based on the findings and analysis. This part shifts from describing “what is” to advising “what should be done.”

Clear, Action-Oriented Suggestions

Each recommendation should clearly state what needs to be done, by whom, and how.

Justification

Briefly explain why each recommendation is being made, tying it to your findings or analysis.

Feasibility

Ensure your suggestions are practical and realistic within the context of the case.

Prioritisation (optional)

Indicate which actions are most urgent or important if there are several recommendations.

Short-term vs Long-term

Differentiate between immediate fixes and longer-term strategic changes if appropriate