ASSIGNMENT DETAILS
This assignment provides you with the opportunity to demonstrate your knowledge and application of the theories, concepts, and techniques covered throughout this module. You are required to critically examine a business process associated with a UK organisation that could be from the private sector, public sector or a government service that you have experienced or researched. Examples may include services such as passport renewals, driving licence applications, visa processing, council tax services, NHS appointments, repeat prescription requests, National Insurance applications, or any other service. These examples are provided for guidance only and are not intended to limit your choice.
Using your chosen service, you will investigate how the existing process operates from the customer's perspective and identify areas where operational performance can be improved. You should examine the current workflow, making informed assumptions about internal activities where necessary, and evaluate opportunities to enhance efficiency, service quality, customer satisfaction, and sustainability. Based on your analysis, you will develop two alternative process improvement proposals, recommend the most appropriate solution, and explain how it could be successfully implemented using suitable project management principles.
Your report must include the following 4 tasks:
Task 1: Nature of Process Improvement/ Lean Management (LO1, LO5)
Critically evaluate three (3) concepts used within Lean Management methodologies considering the following key themes, continuous improvement, process improvement methodologies, process mapping and how they are linked to sustainability. When showing your understanding of the concepts, you should apply these to your chosen government service.
Task 2: Process Analysis and Modelling (LO2, LO3)
Analyse a process (from a customer perspective) for the government department. You should scope the business process problem and subsequently analyse and model the current process. You should map the current process, including relevant analysis and include a discussion around the ‘AS-IS’, this should identify the main problem with the current process.
Task 3: Process Redesign and Modelling (LO2, LO3)
Discuss and model two (2) options for process redesign for the chosen business process. The relevant analysis/modelling diagrams should draw from Task 2 and show a clear improvement to the current process as you create two possible ‘TO-BE’ states for the organisation. You should include the benefits and challenges these process changes will bring to the organisation and provide the reader with an understanding of the organisation’s viable options and a justified recommendation.
Task 4: Process Implementation (LO4)
Recommend implementation and management of the business process from Task 3 using relevant module material. Evaluate the suitability of Agile Project Methodology for the implementation of your recommended option. You are now required to write a recommendation advocating the use of Agile as the preferred methodology for your process improvement. Your discussion should demonstrate an understanding of Agile principles and effectively justify its suitability for managing the project life cycle.
Please see the suggested assignment structure:
1- Coversheet
2- Introduction (Approximately 125 words)
3- Main body
3.1 – Process improvement / Lean management (Approximately 500 words)
a. Critically Evaluate 3 concepts
3.2 – Process Analysis and Modelling (Approximately 500 words)
a) The customer perspective
b) Current process map
c) Discuss the “AS-IS”
3.3 – Process Redesign and Modelling (Approximately 625 words)
a) Two options for process redesign
b) Demonstrate a clear improvement
c) Benefits and challenges of new processes
d) Identify viable options for the organisation
3.4 – Process Implementation (Approximately 625 words)
a) Recommend implementation and process management
b) Evaluate the suitability of the Agile project methodology
c) Make recommendations for the suitable implementation considering the project life cycle
d) Limitations of the new process
4- Conclusion (Approximately 125 words)
Please refer to the marking criteria (below) for a breakdown of how the tasks will be marked. Please follow the Reference Link on the Library front page, which will take you through to the guide – ULaw Harvard (APA 7th).
Assessment Criteria
|
MARKING CRITERIA
|
Mark |
FAIL (0 – |
PASS (50 – |
COMMENDATION (60 – |
DISTINCTION (70-100%)
|
|
Exhibits an unsatisfactory grasp of |
Satisfactory grasp of the issues, |
Good/very good understanding of the |
Excellent level of understanding. All requirements are dealt with to a |
||
|
Task The
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 2: (20%) Process Analysis and Modelling (LO2, LO3) The
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 3: (25%) Process Redesign and Modelling (LO2, LO3) The Expansive
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Task 4: (25%) Process Implementation (LO4) The |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Presentation and Style 10% (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5) A well-presented report that contains all key elements; |
10 |
|
|
|
|