TCHR5010 Theory to practice Competency and capability of Preschoolers
TCHR5010 Theory to practice: Competency and capability of Preschoolers
Assessment One: Portfolio
Information Booklet
Assessment name: | Portfolio |
Due Date: | Friday,18th July 2025 by 11:59 pm |
Weighting: | 50% |
Length: | 1500 words(10%+/-) |
Task Description: |
This Portfolio is comprised of two tasks submitted as one Word document. Write in full paragraphs with no bullet points/numbered lists Task 1: Professional Philosophy (approximately 500 words) Write your professional philosophy statement for working with Preschool age children. Include four(4) important aspects of preschoolers’ learning and development that we have been focusing on in the unit from the following: Diversity and inclusion Relationships Quality Transition to school Supporting pro-social competencies Links to relevant theoretical perspectives must be made.
Task 2: Goals and Critical reflection (approximately 1000 words) Set 4 personal goals that you want to achieve on your forthcoming professional experience with Preschoolers.Critically reflect on these goals and consider 1 challenge that could prevent you from achieving each goal (4 challenges in total).Discuss how you will overcome each challenge. Make links to the unit text, the NQS and EYLF in your discussions. |
Referencing and formatting |
Formatting: Use APA 7 formatting throughout (this includes indented paragraphs, double-lined spacing). No contents page is needed for this task. Referencing Style Resource AboutAPA7th-APA7thReferencingGuide-LibraryguidesatSouthernCrossUniversity(scu.edu.au) |
Resources |
National Quality Standard https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard Early Years Learning Frame work https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf |
DetailsoftheUnittextareavailableviatheOrientationModuleontheunitBlackboardsite. |
|
Support Resources |
The work shops for this unit will fully unpack the task requirements. Academic Integrity–SCU guidelines Academic Integrity Module-mandatory module for first year students Learning Zone– workshops, Quick Guides |

For example: You may use Grammarly Premium to provide feedback and suggestions on your writing for academic tone, written expression, grammar, Australian English spelling, and punctuation.You must not use Gen AI to generate ideas for this assessment task. If you choose to use these tools, you must include an appendix to demonstrate your work prior to using GenAI.
NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly,close paraphrasing,plagiarism,recycling,misrepresentation,collusion,cheating,contract cheating, fabricating information. |
|
Grades and Feedback | Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and feedback will be posted to the‘ Grades and Feedback’ section on the Black board unit site.Please allow 10 days following submission for marks to be available. |
Assessment 1 Rubric (TCHR5010)
Marking Criteria and & allocation | High Distinction+ (100%) | High Distinction(85-99%) | Distinction(75-84%) |
Credit (65-74%) |
Pass (50-64%) |
Marginal Fail (35-49%) |
Fail (0-49%) |
Notaddressed(0%) |
Criterion 1 Professional Philosophy Clarity, coherence, and critical engagement with 4 important aspects (e.g., relationships,quality, diversity,inclusion, transition,pro-social development) |
Outstanding articulation of philosophy with deep critical insight and seamless integration of unit themes |
Clear,coherent, and critically informed philosophy with excellent integration of unit themes | Well-structured philosophy with good critical thought and integration of key ideas |
Sound articulation with some critical engagement; mostly integrates key concepts |
Basic articulation with limited depth; concepts addressed but not well developed | Superficial or vague ideas with limited reference to unit content |
Philosophy poorly expressed or largely off- topic |
Not attempted or entirely missing |
Criterion 2 Goal Setting & Relevance Quality, clarity, and relevance of goals for professional placement; alignment with preschool context |
Goals are highly relevant,specific,measurable, and show exceptional insight into professional growth |
Goals are clear,appropriate, and reflect a strong understanding of professional context |
Goals are appropriate and well considered; reflect good understanding of preschool settings |
Goals show some relevance and understanding; partially developed | Goals are simplistic or general but meet basic expectations |
Goals lack clarity,relevance,or understanding of professional placement |
Goals are inappropriate or absent of educational context | Not addressed or omitted entirely |
Criterion 3 Critical Reflection & challenges. Depth of critical reflection on each goal; identification and analysis of challenges and responses |
Exceptional depth of critical reflection; insightful and proactive strategies clearly linked to literature and frameworks |
Thorough reflection and realistic strategies; strong use of references and frame work links |
Good critical thought and logical responses;appropriate references used |
Adequate reflection: challenge resolution lacks some detail; limited reference integration |