Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

TCHR5010 Theory to practice Competency and capability of Preschoolers

TCHR5010 Theory to practice Competency and capability of Preschoolers

TCHR5010 Theory to practice: Competency and capability of Preschoolers

 Assessment One: Portfolio

Information Booklet

Assessment name: Portfolio
Due Date: Friday,18th July 2025 by 11:59 pm
Weighting: 50%
Length: 1500 words(10%+/-)
Task Description:

This Portfolio is comprised of two tasks submitted as one Word document. Write in full paragraphs with no bullet points/numbered lists

Task 1: Professional Philosophy (approximately 500 words)

Write your professional philosophy statement for working with Preschool age children.  Include four(4) important aspects of preschoolers’ learning and development that we have been focusing on in the unit from the following:

Diversity and inclusion Relationships

Quality

Transition to school

Supporting pro-social competencies

Links to relevant theoretical perspectives must be made.

 

Task 2: Goals and Critical reflection (approximately 1000 words)

Set 4 personal goals that you want to achieve on your forthcoming professional experience with Preschoolers.Critically reflect on these goals and consider 1 challenge that could prevent you from achieving each goal (4 challenges in total).Discuss how you will overcome each challenge. Make links to the unit text, the NQS and EYLF in your discussions.

Referencing and formatting
  • APA Referencing style is required to be used for this task
  • Include one reference list for all responses on a new page at the end of task
  • A minimum of 8(eight) academic sources are to be included in the reference list
  • At a minimum, your sources for this task will include the EYLF v2.0 (AGDE, 2022), NQS (ACECQA,2018), the unit text, and arange of broader authoritative literature. Broader literature may include contemporary textbooks, peer reviewed articles, and other authoritative sources

 

Formatting: Use APA 7 formatting throughout (this includes indented paragraphs, double-lined spacing). No contents page is needed for this task.

Referencing Style Resource

AboutAPA7th-APA7thReferencingGuide-LibraryguidesatSouthernCrossUniversity(scu.edu.au)

 
Resources

 

National Quality Standard https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard

Early Years Learning Frame work https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022-V2.0.pdf

 

DetailsoftheUnittextareavailableviatheOrientationModuleontheunitBlackboardsite.

Support Resources

The work shops for this unit will fully unpack the task requirements.

Academic Integrity–SCU guidelines

Academic Integrity Module-mandatory module for first year students Learning Zone– workshops, Quick Guides

 

 

 

For example: You may use Grammarly Premium to provide feedback and suggestions on your writing for academic tone, written expression, grammar, Australian English spelling, and punctuation.You must not use Gen AI to generate ideas for this assessment task. If you choose to use these tools, you must include an appendix to demonstrate your work prior to using GenAI.

 

NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly,close paraphrasing,plagiarism,recycling,misrepresentation,collusion,cheating,contract cheating, fabricating information.

Grades and Feedback Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and feedback will be posted to the‘ Grades and Feedback’ section on the Black board unit site.Please allow 10 days following submission for marks to be available.

 

Assessment 1 Rubric (TCHR5010)

 

 

 

 

 

Marking Criteria and & allocation High Distinction+ (100%) High Distinction(85-99%) Distinction(75-84%)

Credit

(65-74%)

Pass

(50-64%)

Marginal Fail (35-49%)

Fail

(0-49%)

Notaddressed(0%)

Criterion 1

Professional Philosophy Clarity, coherence, and critical engagement with 4 important aspects (e.g., relationships,quality, diversity,inclusion,

transition,pro-social development)

Outstanding

articulation of philosophy with deep critical insight and seamless integration of unit themes

Clear,coherent, and critically informed philosophy with excellent integration of unit themes Well-structured philosophy with good critical thought and integration of key ideas

Sound

articulation with some critical

engagement; mostly integrates key concepts

Basic articulation with limited depth; concepts addressed but not well developed Superficial or vague ideas with limited reference to unit content

Philosophy poorly

expressed or largely off- topic

Not attempted or entirely missing

Criterion 2

Goal Setting & Relevance Quality, clarity, and relevance of goals for professional placement; alignment with preschool context

Goals are highly relevant,specific,measurable, and show exceptional insight into professional growth

Goals are clear,appropriate, and reflect a

strong understanding of professional context

Goals are appropriate and well

considered; reflect good understanding of preschool settings

Goals show some relevance and understanding; partially developed Goals are simplistic or general but meet basic expectations

Goals lack clarity,relevance,or

understanding of professional placement

Goals are inappropriate or absent of educational context Not addressed or omitted entirely

Criterion 3

Critical Reflection & challenges.

Depth of critical reflection on each goal;

identification and analysis of challenges and

responses

Exceptional depth of critical reflection; insightful and proactive strategies clearly linked to literature and frameworks

Thorough reflection and realistic

strategies;

strong use of references and frame work links

Good critical thought and logical responses;appropriate references used

Adequate reflection: challenge

resolution lacks some detail; limited reference integration

Scroll to Top