To prepare:
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
The Assignment
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.
Provide an overview of the article you selected.What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?What were the author’s claims?Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides. Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.
· NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to
10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing
a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with
addictive disorders.•Provide an overview of the article you selected,
including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under
consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new
intervention or one that was already used?What were the author’s claims?
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered
population…. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately
described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is
new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a thorough
and accurate description of the author’s claims.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation defines the considered population…. The specific
intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the
intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response
includes a description of the author’s claims.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population….
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described….
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s
claims.
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it
is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately
described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate
description of the author’s claims, or is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning Outcomeo Explain the
findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will
translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings
of the selected article…. The response fully addresses whether or not the
outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected
article…. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will
translate into practice with clients.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review
of the findings of the selected article…. The response partially or
inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into
practice with clients.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the
findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially
or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into
practice with clients, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning Outcome• Explain whether the
limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the
findings/outcomes presented in the article.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the
whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the
findings presented in the article.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the
limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings
presented in the article.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete
explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your
ability to use the findings presented in the article.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of
the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use
the findings presented in the article, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning Outcome•Use the Notes
function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of
your slides.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to
comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand
upon the presentation slides.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are
vague or contain small inaccuracies.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately
expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.
10 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning Outcome• Support your
response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain
why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on
your last slide.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation is strongly supported with at least three
peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included
on the last slide.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last
slide.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included
on the last slide.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources, and/or the reference list is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and
Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded.
Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling
nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in
presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for
flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing
standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked
to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and
Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and
proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that
interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
