You have studied the basic procedures for interviewing witnesses and suspects, including children. You have explored the difference between accusatory and nonaccusatory interview strategies and analyzed the utility of evaluations of risk. Most importantly, you have observed a Mental Status Exam and completed an MSE template and report.
This week, we will consider some special topics in forensic interviewing and evaluation, including malingering, lie detection/deception, and the nature of false confessions. One area of particular concern is malingering, which may be more important in forensic evaluation than clinical evaluation. The American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) manual of mental disorders defines malingering as:
“the intentional production of false or grossly exaggerated physical or psychological symptoms, motivated by external incentives”
Clients might malinger in a forensic context for some type of gain or to avoid an adverse event. The stakes are often high in forensic contexts, so it is critical that a good forensic evaluation include an evaluation of malingering.
This week, you will also explore the role of forensic professionals in creating positive social change. You will evaluate your professional growth as a result of completing this course. Looking to the future, what unique skills do you bring to the task of forensic investigation as a result of completing this course
The post WEEK 6: AT A GLANCE SPECIAL TOPICS IN INTERVIEWING AND EVALUATION first appeared on Writeden.