XS6008 Advanced Research Methods in Business CW1 Qualitative Research Report Assessment Brief

XS6008 Assignment Brief

XS6008 Guidance

Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in the Harvard KU system. You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that lecturer will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work. Maximum word count: 2500 words.
Please note the following:

Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment. The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (excluding in text citations and references). The word count excludes front page, list of references and appendices. Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deduction.

Notes for students :

• Electronic copy of assignment should be submitted through Canvas and the Turnitin software. 
• Students should ensure that they comply with University’s plagiarism policy.
• Students should make correct use of the Harvard referencing method. 

Learning Outcomes Tested in this Assignment:

• Demonstrate an understanding of different sources of data and materials relevant to analysis within the chosen subject area.
• Demonstrate an understanding of qualitative research methods and an ability to analyse qualitative data as an aid for business decision making.
• Critically discuss the relevance of qualitative research to business organisations and their operations
• Formulate research question and undertake detailed literature review including due consideration of ethical requirements on chosen topic
• Plan and present research findings in a clear and coherent manner accurately citing a range of sources using appropriate academic conventions

XS6008 Purpose:

The aim of this assignment is to enable students to critically engage with examples of qualitative research design and methodology as found in the literature. They are to apply their understanding of issues in design, methodology and of research quality criteria to a critical assessment of a published, empirical qualitative research paper. 

XS6008 Description: 

1. Begin your assessment with an introduction to contextualise your critique through critical evaluation of the place of qualitative research in relation to strategies in business research.
2. Identify 1 qualitative research paper from a high quality journal (Consult your supervisor for advice on appropriate papers if necessary.) The paper must be an empirical paper – one that generates primary or fresh data through research practice – and must make use of qualitative methods (not quantitative methods). You must provide a justification for your selection.
3. You are to examine and critically evaluate the paper and prepare a critique of it that gives special emphasis to the literature review, methodology used for the studies and research results. 
4. Before you critique the papers, it is suggested that you consider what quality criteria are relevant and that you will employ to conduct the analysis and critique. You should include a short section that outlines that consideration and establishes the criteria. The authors of the article may, of course, address quality criteria themselves. 

Your qualitative research report should be based on the following two criteria:

A) You are required to summarise one article based on international business. Your report could consist of the following for section A:

• An introduction to your topic 
• A background to the topic 
• Presentation of the article (Employ CRAAP Test) 

B) For section B your report should be able to use key information from your notes  to present the suggested headings below for the final section of your report:

• A summary of key findings from the article
• A critical analysis that includes research purpose, literature review, methodology and  results (This is not an exhaustive list)
• A conclusion 

*Other sources can be used within the whole report but should demonstrate an  understanding of the chosen academic article you have been able to present  information for.

5. It is vital that you critically evaluate and assess how well the article applies and reports the method. A critique is not simply a summary of the article. 

6.Write up your assessment then edit, proof-read and submit your assessment via VLE Canvas page of Kingston University. 

Word Limit: 2500 words 

XS6008 Referencing Guidance

You must underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate  and wide-ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the Harvard  KU system.

Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Kingston University Library.

THE BROAD ASSESSMENT CRITERIA USED will be: 

• Establishment of criteria to critique the article 
• Evaluation of article 
• Quality of academic writing 
• Critical and analytical Ability
• Recommendation and Referencing 

Would students please note that achievement of the learning outcomes for this assessment is demonstrated against the assessment criteria shown below.  All marks/grades remain indicative until they have been considered and confirmed by the Assessment Board

Please note the followings:

Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment. The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (excluding in-text citations and references). The word count excludes the front page, list of references and appendices. Please note that exceeding the word count by over 10% will result in a 10-percentage point deduction.

An electronic copy of the assignment should be submitted through Canvas and the Turnitin software. Students should ensure that they comply with University’s plagiarism policy. Students should make correct use of the Harvard referencing method. students must underpin their analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide-ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the Harvard system. Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Kingston University Library.

In addition, the board assessment criteria will be: 

• Establishment of criteria to critique the article 
• Evaluation of article 
• Quality of academic writing 
• Critical and analytical Ability
• Recommendation and Referencing 

Please note that the achievement of the learning outcomes for this assessment is demonstrated against the assessment criteria shown below.  All marks/grades remain indicative until they have been considered and confirmed by the Assessment Board.

Are You Looking for Answer of XS6008 CW1 Research Report

Request to Buy Answer

XS6008 Feedback and Marking Criteria