Matthew is a single 40-year-old African American male

Matthew is a single 40-year-old African American male

Matthew is a single 40-year-old African American male. He was admitted to the Hart City Rehabilitation Facility (HCRF) following a brain injury. His complex medical history includes alcohol and cocaine abuse, lung disease, and other problems. He has a criminal record for theft, experienced chronic unemployment, and lived alone in a home owned by a relative who occasionally provided him with a meal. Matthew lacks financial resources, such as a bank account or social service benefits. He cannot verbalize any long-term goals or plans for himself. Upon admission to the HCRF, Matthew requested that an advanced human services professional practitioner assist him with applying for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. He also reported that there had been a fire at his relative’s house and that he was eligible for $7,500 in insurance claims for the loss of his personal belongings in the fire. He did not want the relative contacted and, instead, requested that the advanced human services professional practitioner contact the insurance company, file the claim, and collect the benefits. Matthew is clearly vulnerable, and he needs assistance. However, given Matthew’s history and recent brain injury, there is a very strong possibility that Matthew’s claim is not valid, as it does not look like Matthew had $7,500 in personal possessions. The advanced human services professional practitioner may participate in fraud if they help file Matthew’s claim.


Matthew is a single 40-year-old African American male

Matthew’s situation presents complex ethical and professional dilemmas for the advanced human services professional practitioner. While Matthew clearly needs assistance, there are concerns about the potential for participation in fraudulent activities. It’s essential for the practitioner to navigate this situation with integrity, adherence to professional standards, and a commitment to Matthew’s well-being.


**Ethical Considerations:**

**Beneficence and Non-Maleficence:** The practitioner’s primary obligation is to promote Matthew’s well-being while avoiding harm. This involves ensuring that any actions taken are in Matthew’s best interests and do not perpetuate fraudulent behavior or exploitation.


**Justice:** The practitioner must consider the fair and equitable distribution of resources and services. This includes ensuring that Matthew receives the support he genuinely needs without unfairly obtaining benefits to which he is not entitled.


**Integrity:** Upholding honesty and integrity is fundamental to the professional conduct of human services practitioners. Engaging in fraudulent activities would violate these principles and undermine trust in the profession.


**Professional Responsibilities:**

**Assessment and Evaluation:** The practitioner must conduct a thorough assessment of Matthew’s situation, including his financial resources, eligibility for benefits, and the validity of his insurance claim. This assessment should involve gathering relevant information from reliable sources, such as documentation and corroborating evidence.


**Informed Consent and Autonomy:** It’s important to respect Matthew’s autonomy and involve him in decision-making to the extent possible. This includes informing him of the potential consequences of filing a fraudulent claim and exploring alternative options for assistance.


**Collaboration and Advocacy:** The practitioner should collaborate with other professionals, such as social workers, healthcare providers, and legal experts, to ensure comprehensive support for Matthew. Advocacy may involve connecting Matthew with appropriate services and advocating for his rights and needs within legal and ethical boundaries.


**Course of Action:**

**Verification of Claim:** The practitioner should verify the validity of Matthew’s insurance claim by examining any available evidence, such as documentation of the fire and an inventory of lost belongings. If there are doubts about the claim’s validity, the practitioner should refrain from filing it and explore alternative avenues for assistance.


**Exploration of Legal and Ethical Options:** The practitioner should consult with colleagues or supervisors, as well as legal experts if necessary, to determine the appropriate course of action in compliance with ethical and legal standards. This may involve exploring alternative sources of financial support for Matthew and addressing any immediate needs through legitimate means.


**Supportive Services:** Regardless of the outcome of the insurance claim, the practitioner should provide ongoing support and assistance to Matthew, addressing his physical, emotional, and social needs in a holistic manner. This may include connecting him with rehabilitation services, substance abuse treatment, housing assistance, and vocational rehabilitation programs.


In conclusion, the advanced human services professional practitioner faces a challenging situation with Matthew that requires careful consideration of ethical principles, professional responsibilities, and legal obligations. While it’s crucial to provide support to vulnerable individuals like Matthew, it’s equally important to uphold integrity and avoid participation in fraudulent activities. By conducting a thorough assessment, exploring alternative options, and collaborating with other professionals, the practitioner can navigate this dilemma in a manner that prioritizes Matthew’s well-being while maintaining ethical standards.

The post Matthew is a single 40-year-old African American male appeared first on Destiny Papers.